The debate on whether spoken communication is more powerful than written communication has been ongoing for a long time. In my opinion, I partially agree that spoken communication is more powerful than written communication, but it also depends on the context.
On the one hand, spoken communication is more powerful than written communication in situations where emotions and personal connections matter. For instance, when comforting a friend who is going through a difficult time, speaking to them in person or on the phone is more effective than sending them a text message or an email. The tone of voice, facial expressions, and body language can convey empathy and provide a sense of comfort that written words cannot match.
On the other hand, written communication can be more powerful than spoken communication in situations that require precision, clarity, and permanence. When writing a legal contract, for example, it is important to be clear and concise to avoid any misunderstandings. Similarly, written communication is useful when documenting important information or instructions that need to be referenced later.
In conclusion, while spoken communication can be more powerful than written communication in some situations, written communication is more effective in others. Ultimately, the choice between spoken and written communication depends on the context and purpose of the message being conveyed.
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62962962963 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36017995468 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.1415777824 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.6 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490359317079 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245080710711 0.084324248473 291% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174375792518 0.0667982634062 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360695342789 0.151304729494 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111525294418 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.