In the few recent decades, globalisation has advanced at a high speed and effected people's life in almost all aspects. In my point of view, internationalisation is a two-edged sword, bringing both enormous benefits as well as drawbacks.
It is no doubt that the trend of globalisation gives a boost to the world economy. For instance, international trade, which is beneficial for all nations involved and allows a country to focus on some certain industries. As a result, the productivity will be enhanced significantly. Moreover, globalisation also promotes the employment in the developing countries, and makes it possible for people in the developed countries to buy hight quality goods at a fairly reasonable price. Another example is that multinational companies practically provides fund, technology and managerial experience to the developing countries as well.
On the other hand, global process also causes some problems, if not handled properly, it would lead to serious consequences. In the developing countries, a large number of local enterprises closed down, as they were defeated in the competition with other transnational counterparts. In rich countries, it also sees demonstration against globalisation held by those who lost their jobs due to international free trade. In additionally, this tendency has a big effect on environment, especially underdeveloped regions. Foreign tourism sometimes bring modern lifestyle technology to local people, which effects on the peace of their life and even causes severe pollution.
In conclusion, globalisation has become an irreversible trend due to the increasing communication and cooperation in over the world. In the process of promoting globalisation, people should guard against negative impacts of this trend.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 73
- The spread of multinational companies and increase in spread of globalization have positive effects for everyone. Do you agree or disagree. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... sword, bringing both enormous benefits as well as drawbacks. It is no doubt that the tre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... example is that multinational companies practically provides fund, technology an...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sequences. In the developing countries, a large number of local enterprises closed down, as they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r jobs due to international free trade. In additionally, this tendency has a big e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66292134831 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48538046009 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644194756554 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9380990245 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0791893107757 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241837299083 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240055819673 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407253795747 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195193801517 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.