It is frequently argued that pupils study far more with their teachers than other sources such as the internet or television. From my perspective, it can not be denied that students can learn a lot from the internet and TV set and these have become an indispensable part of education yet I believed that educators also have a crucial role in students' learning. And in this essay, I will demonstrate my point of view by analyzing the merits of studying with their schoolteachers and the sundry disadvantages of absorbing through the internet and tiny screen.
To begin with, there is no denying that learning with lecturers has several benefits. Since people were small toddlers in kindergartens until they were undergrads, there have always been dons who assisted them in gaining comprehension. Obviously, no one can learn by his method without the teacher's guidance since they are predecessors with in-depth intelligence who know how to learn properly due to experience. If a pupil does not appear to comprehend, they will lend a helping hand and work together to solve challenges. This is good for students due to the fact they not only get additional information, but they also obtain sundry practical problem-solving abilities that will be useful in their future careers. Furthermore, when taught by well-qualified professors, trainers prefer to follow a reasonable study regimen. For example, several lethargic graduates excitedly stated that they were thankful to their helpers since they constantly reminded them of their homework and helped them rigorously, which made them more motivated and better.
On the other hand, it is not always necessary to have teacher's guides; juniors can study independently using other resources such as the internet or useful websites. The reason for this is that there are numerous documents on the Internet that are contributed in various ways by people all over the world, including element scientists, experts, and those with in-depth knowledge. This is a really trustworthy authority to get them to figure out. The more enthused students are about it, the more they want to investigate. It is also a means for them to assist themselves in becoming self-sufficient. It is a standard strategy used in practically all institutions; Alumni must elaborate teachings while lecturers make fewer announcements. The information absorbed directly is easier to understand than tiresome sermons in classes; also, imparting entire knowledge in class takes a long time since academics can only offer them the basics, which are insufficient for them to know inside. As a result, learning with lecturers is more likely to render scholars passive. Teenagers take in information in a hazy manner because they only look forward to their teachers. Actually, it is tough for them to manage complicated and predictable difficulties.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that technology can be educative, on the contrary the role of supervisors is not replaced. The ocean of philosophy may be really accessible to undergraduates only when it is handed down by lecturers.
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Some people believe that studying online is more effective than studying on campus while others disagree Discuss both the views and provide your opinion 78
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 84
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...one can learn by his method without the teachers guidance since they are predecessors wi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1097, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hazy manner" with adverb for "hazy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... passive. Teenagers take in information in a hazy manner because they only look forward to their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, really, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 494.0 315.596192385 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27732793522 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06355569061 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550607287449 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2748016948 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.59090909091 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211611475117 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627409431991 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848110829872 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127174766945 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939236937671 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.