These days, traffic disasters are a dangerous menace that humans are facing. It is still open to debate whether the primary driver of this issue is the sharp increase in the number of vehicles especially motorbikes or solely the result of man’s fault. I wholeheartedly suppose that people’s fault plays an integral part in the significant rise in these mishaps
There are fundamental rationales why motorbikes are to blame for traffic accidents. More motorbikes mean the congestion is more severe when the main roads witness an immense influx of hundreds of commuters who are vacationers or employees. Nevertheless, all of them make an attempt to overtake the car in front instead of being in the queue, which in turn causes chaos and crashes. However, others means of transportation should not be overlooked since accidents have cropped up everywhere. Airway, for instance, is even considered the most hazardous way of transport accounting for thousands of fatalities each year.
Despite these aforementioned reasons, I still suppose that human's errors are at fault. First and foremost, the incremental accidents that cause death are due to the adverse behaviors of numerous drivers, especially young people. Overspeeding which is widespread among the youth, for example, intensely contributes to a drastic rise in the number of these disasters.Adolescents, on the other hand, are thought to be insufficiently mature to have in-depth knowledge of the serious consequences of their in-disciplined actions and easily get away with what they triggered. Moreover, unsafe road environment such as slippery surface and insufficient safety facilities is admitted to serve as external factors in a high number of fatal accidents. Henceforth, it is the responsibility of the government authorities to advance the transport systems which have been in alarming condition.
In conclusion, the reasons for which road accidents are derived are various. However, I strongly believe that citizens need to gain an understanding of how to deal with several inevitable hardships.
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc 73
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...immense influx of hundreds of commuters who are vacationers or employees. Nevertheless,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered the most hazardous way of transport accounting for thousands of fatalities e...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cremental accidents that cause death are due to the adverse behaviors of numerous...
^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Adolescents
...c rise in the number of these disasters.Adolescents, on the other hand, are thought to be i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51724137931 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23354497893 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630094043887 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2377598918 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241443997211 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690262004539 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050426163737 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128260383459 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342543747455 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.