Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree

Numerous argued that students are more likely to learn better with their teachers than other sources such as Internet and television. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view. It is apparent that technological tools help scholars a lot in education on the contrary assistants play a more crucial role in training pupils with their real experience. This essay will support this argument by analyzing the advantages of studying face-to-face with professors and several drawbacks of training through Internet or television.

Initially, teachers, with a dedicated instruction, might understand that people have various styles to gain knowledge. Supervisors have ability to know which levels undergraduates are and how to improve their learning. In doing so, there are numerous appropriate ways for learners in order to acquire lessons effectively. Furthermore, teachers are only people that realize student's mistakes exactly. As a result, they will correct these faults by giving their juniors worthwhile advices. Thus, one cannot deny that a number of skills require lecturer for undergraduates to learn effectively.

In other words, there are several disadvantages of pondering through Internet and television. Online examining means more screen-time. Excessive screen-time can lead to all sorts of physical ailments like poor posture or headaches. On the contrary it can also be a personal issue to scholars who struggle with learning from or focusing on screens.

In conclusion, it is teachers that help pupils learn better than other technological tools. Instead, juniors ought to combine two ways of grinding to gain the best result in the future.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... that students are more likely to learn better with their teachers than other sources ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56299212598 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99042896343 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3474321275 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289271403081 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830179242166 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970818146274 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150376620857 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767333963158 0.056905535591 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.