There has been a stereotype which existed long time ago that going to a place where English is widely spoken will provide pupils with the best technique of English instruction. Nevertheless, In my opinion, it is an efficient, yet not an optimal choice for them to meet.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that studying abroad is an ideal approach for pupils to learn about other countries as spending time living in another country creates a golden chance for pupils to increase their knowledge of other nations that differ from theirs through other means. For starters, when studying overseas, it is paramount of importance that students acquire fundamental grammar enough to strike up or hold a basic conversation with indigenous people. Therefore, after a long time practicing by listening to native speakers and using it on a daily basis, they can have a high level of proficiency in it and step by step have an air of confidence about their communication skills. To cite an example, teenagers who study overseas since they were little kids tend to speak fluently their second languages or have the ability to learn languages more quickly than those who do not. Moreover, the exposure to various customs and languages can broaden young people’s horizon and open their minds. However, It is undeniable that only the affluent and privileged are willing to fork out extravagant money for their children going abroad. For impoverished habitants, with their minimum wage, it is absolutely beyond their reach. Not only money for flights and accommodation do pupils need to take into consideration but also for fundamental demands. Furthermore, culture shock as well as homesickness in the initial days possibly affect the process they acquire understanding.
Apart from the practical benefits aforementioned, there are still several ways to acquire this language. With the advent of cutting-edge technologies, learners can easily access to their studying materials. The internet is updated every day from numerous sources, making it current and pertinent. Newspaper articles and other materials, for example, are posted on-screen to make them more accessible and cost-effective. Moreover, it also enables youngsters to connect with the local people in one English country effortlessly. Another remedy is learning through English radio programs or TV shows. Considered as the most enriching, and effective way to learn English, watching TV series will assist you to increase your listening skills and know the exact/precise wording in each situation.
In conclusion, due to the financial limitation, most students cannot study abroad. However, this has no bearing on their acquisition of knowledge about foreign languages and cultures as there are still a number of perfect substitutions, helping them learn about the world without leaving their country.
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 89
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 5.05154639175 337% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 32.9175257732 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 26.3917525773 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 937.175257732 258% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 449.0 206.0 218% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37639198218 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 3.78020617076 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92219158759 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 127.690721649 205% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583518930958 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 290.88556701 253% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0714245485 44.8134815571 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.7 76.5299724578 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.45 16.8248392259 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 4.34317383033 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 7.41237113402 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273171491038 0.216113520407 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688330824867 0.0766984524023 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530111614928 0.0603063233224 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151905523822 0.12726935374 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347068144973 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 8.37731958763 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 8.71597938144 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 41.2886597938 320% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 5.05154639175 337% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 32.9175257732 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 26.3917525773 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 937.175257732 258% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 449.0 206.0 218% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37639198218 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 3.78020617076 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92219158759 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 127.690721649 205% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583518930958 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 290.88556701 253% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0714245485 44.8134815571 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.7 76.5299724578 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.45 16.8248392259 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 4.34317383033 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 7.41237113402 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273171491038 0.216113520407 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688330824867 0.0766984524023 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530111614928 0.0603063233224 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151905523822 0.12726935374 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347068144973 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 8.37731958763 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 8.71597938144 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 41.2886597938 320% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.