Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money. What are the reasons and solutions of this issue?
It is true that young people do not have a basic understanding of financial management when they leave high school. However, there are a number of reasons behind this trend and schools and parents should adopt several solutions to improve the situation.
There are two primary reasons why students do not have any knowledge about finances administration after finishing high school. One reason is that traditional school subjects such as math, science, or language included in the curriculum do not explicitly teach students about personal finance and how to use it properly. Therefore, high school students answer theoretical questions but find it strange to balance revenues and expenditures. Furthermore, students do not understand how to manage their money because their parents have covered all their wants and needs. Hence, pupils graduating from high school only know how to spend money, not how to use it efficiently, not to mention saving it.
Fortunately, schools and parents could take several measures to prevent and solve this problem. The first solution is that basic money management skills can be included in a compulsory subject for students in their high school years, helping to equip them with financial management knowledge and skills when they leave school. The second measure for this problem is that parents should spend time with their children to teach them money management and critical financial values. They can start by instructing the children on managing their pocket money and household expenses.
In conclusion, there are various reasons why students do not know financial management after graduating from high school, and steps need to be taken to tackle this problem by both schools and parents because they are the best models for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-04 | Trần Thị Ngọc Mai | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | vuhieuquy | 59 | view |
| 2020-11-27 | minhtrile010@gmail.com | 71 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | klaralinh864 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34397163121 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65549805801 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528368794326 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4876445919 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.583333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409538527833 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159673239015 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505963745742 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254250547059 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501370206768 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.