In this modern era, getting education by means of digital resources has been increasingly popular. Hence, there is a split in opinion, regarding how one should pursue his study. Some believe that, a pupil can gain more knowledge from traditional tutoring methodologies while others think that, advanced methods (i.e. youtube, television programs and web-sites) are more effective. In this essay, I will discuss reasons of my disagreement to the statement since, I believe, recent advancement in technology has bought many advantages to the table, to name a few, studying has become more interactive and affordable.
Firstly, unlike conventional chalk and duster kind of teaching where one finds hard to interact with a tutor, thanks to cutting-edge technology it has become easy. This makes learning not only fun but is also associated with one's improvement in retention power. As per a research conducted by MIT which was focused on the teaching methodologies involving traditional and modern one, revelled shocking results, the students' who used on-line materials had witnessed improved memorization capacity by 40 percentage than the former one.
Secondly, with the new technology, the content needs to be created single-time only and there is virtually no recurring investment involved, this greatly contributes to affordability, which is a plus-point for both parents who are sponsoring their child and to the institutes. Because of the digitalization techniques, there are many web-sites have been surfaced which provides membership options to their student, this provides great depth and width of options when it comes to courses, and their member can enrol for any of them for as low as 10$ per course.
All in all, based on above discussion, it is evident that the option to gain knowledge digitally offers plethora of advantages over the normal one.
- Students at schools and universities learn far more from lessons with teachers than others sources such as internet and tv. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 11
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecome easy. This makes learning not only fun but is also associated with improvem...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntage than the former one. Secondly, with the new technology, the content nee...
^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$10'.
Suggestion: $10
...can enrol for any of them for as low as 10$ per course. All in all, based on a...
^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of them for as low as 10$ per course. All in all, based on above discussion, i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40206185567 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01539293638 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659793814433 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.7325876014 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.2 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0750602523281 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277243675122 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282089244155 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378894224802 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276461052739 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.