In this day and age, many analysis tell us that a massive number of adolescents lean towards interacting online than communicating face to face with people. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons for this situation, then some solutions will be argued to decline the opinion of meeting people from children.
There are several causes for this issue to be an alarming trend. Juveniles nowadays are attracted by their electronic devices which made them do not want to talk with another in person anymore. Due to the modern world we are living in, technology plays an indispensable role to our daily life. As it is incredibly necessary to us, youngsters also felt the importance of IT so they try to get to know it. Unfortunately, they may be too obsessed about the research of technology then accidentally being distracted by plenty of things happened on social media which is also related to the IT. After a while, they started to feel that they cannot going anywhere without electronic devices which is lead to the priority of online meeting over directly interacting because of the lack of communication to each other. According to Viet Nam survey, 90% of students are already know how to use the Internet and 70% of them lean towards communicating online than interacting in person due to the same reason I have argued above.
Because of the dangerous consequences are happening these days, we need to have some reasonable measures to motivate teenagers to take more time interacting face to face with others. Parents should control the time their children are spending and the content they are reading with electronic devices. Due to the importance of study to children, parents should limit the content of internet and talk to their child about it in order to protect them from hazardous environment on the Internet. What is more, moms and dads also need to reduce the time their teenagers are spending on it to stop the attraction of social media and motivate them going outside and have conversations with friends. This also prevent children from the harmful radiation of electronic devices are spreading out. In the USA, 80% of parents are limiting the content and the time their teens spending on the Internet and most of their adolescents started to want hanging out with friends and they are also no longer obsessed with the Internet.
To conclude, a large number of the youth now are big on socializing online than interacting directly in person on account of the attraction the Internet gave to them. To stop this, parents need to make a new mandatory about using the Internet for their children to limit not only the time they are spending but also the content they are reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun analysis seems to be countable; consider using: 'many analyses'.
Suggestion: many analyses
In this day and age, many analysis tell us that a massive number of adoles...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...n social media which is also related to the IT. After a while, they started to feel th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ssed with the Internet. To conclude, a large number of the youth now are big on socializing on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, while, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 41.998997996 205% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87608695652 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65913111013 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476086956522 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6813537607 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.941176471 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0588235294 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16547702211 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538902799735 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035980276237 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101735483178 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173072959566 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.