Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In the modern world, people are likely to prior the benefits of original education programs than learning through virtual technology. From my perspective, I totally agree with this assumption due to several reasons.
Firstly, as the progression of technology is spreading, face-to-face conversations are being forgotten, particularly during the lockdown by the Covid-19 pandemic. Generating school activities and conduct direct lessons help pupils to alleviate laziness and also cultivate their creative skills and knowledge. students tend to be more focused on the lessons if the teachers have a direct observation. Otherwise, the appearance of the peers may have the children be more motivated to accomplish their assignments. For instance, if the children do not remember to do the tasks, keep in contact with their fellows may remind them to do that.
Secondly, having the tutors and colleagues beside the children make it easy for them to get the lessons. if students do not understand the entire lesson, they can ask their friends for help. Moreover, studying in classes reduces the percentage of cheating during exams. Hence, the children have to study seriously to get high scores. A prime example is that when the children take their exams through the screen, they are likely to use their phones illegally in order to complete them instead of having preparations for the examinations.
In conclusion, it seems to have more benefits instead of frailties to talk about studying in a traditional way. my firm conviction is that the advantages that the students receive from studying at school are huge and helpful.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Some people say it is better to accept a bad situation while some think it is better to improve it Discuss both of the views and give your own opinion 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 92
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...te their creative skills and knowledge. students tend to be more focused on the lessons ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ke it easy for them to get the lessons. if students do not understand the entire l...
^^
Line 10, column 91, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ead of frailties to talk about studying in a traditional way. my firm conviction is that the advanta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...lk about studying in a traditional way. my firm conviction is that the advantages ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34108527132 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88876985698 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596899224806 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.041076339 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4285714286 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144435364553 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499553112753 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343892186402 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904482349804 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163200122002 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.