Subjects at schools are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In most countries, what is taught in schools is the responsibility of the central government. However, some people believe that teachers should decide the curriculum at schools. I completely disagree with this proposition.
To begin with, the knowledge and skills given by subjects at schools need to be useful for the society and the development of their own country. Thus, the authorities, with essential power and resources, must be responsible for designing the suitable syllabus. In particular, the balancing of time and content between subjects, require not only a substantial knowledge but also practical experiences from pedagogical experts in the educational organization, which is not an easy task that a normal teacher can handle. The roles of teachers should only be limited to transferring good knowledge to learners.
On the other hand, to establish a standardization in educational system, not only the courses but also other systems such as ranking systems and examinations need also be coordinated by the authorities. For example, every high school students in Vietnam, who expect to move to higher education have to attend the university entrance examination. In addition, it is also required that the teaching facilities have to be updated concurrently with the development of the country. As a result, more and more schools are translating into practice the use of technology in the teaching sessions.
In conclusion, designing syllabus as well as building a standardization in educational system is not a teacher’s duties. Therefore, I personally believe that the authorities who have enough power should be responsible for this jobs instead of normal teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... enough power should be responsible for this jobs instead of normal teachers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50957854406 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28746795799 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7026088637 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.615384615 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227725748139 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814036613831 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537704925464 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143829782117 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571165242605 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.