The pie charts show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003.
The pie chart shows the proportion of the energy generated from six different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003. Overall, although the percentage of energy produced from oil decreased, it still remained the highest figure in both years. On the other hand, natural gas and hydro sources witnessed a significant growth in 2003.
As shown, most of the energy was generated by oil (52%), while the amount of energy produced by natural gas only accounted for a quarter of oil’s figure. Then, it decreased slightly to 39% in 2003 while there was a significant fall from 22% to 8% in the proportion of nuclear power. On the other hand, natural gas figure experienced a considerable increase to 23% in the amount of energy produced.
Regarding other sources, coal figure stood at 8% before increasing by nearly threefold to 22% in 2003. Similarly, while the amount of energy produced by renewable resources increases significantly to accounted for 4% in 2003, the figure for hydro still remained stable at 4%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98235294118 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7741328643 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6195116074 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333201468289 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157070178655 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180607203636 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246391487706 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180255637314 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.