To succeed in a business, one needs to be good at maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In every society, every individual covets success insatiably. In order to reach this aspiration, some people contend that excelling in mathematics is a must in businessmen. From my point of view, although maths can play a vital role in prosperous business, I, however, believe that there are other several factors that can contribute to one’s success.
The first thing to notice is that people need holistic knowledge in every field in a bid to achieve success. Some claim that mathematics is the most pivotal as it relates to finance and economic growth, but I advocate that social skills and academics in marketing, stocks, etc are also as significant as maths. Undoubtedly, if employers can hone those teamworking skills, cooperating skills and the like, they can perform better at work and culminate in higher productivity. Furthermore, knowledge in different fields and subjects can stand people in good stead in terms of their visions and strategies in the market. As a result, thay can be a precursor for one’s success and job prospects.
Moreover, it is not only about academics and skills that can determine success, but luck and social circles are also of importance. Only when businessmen are given luck and opportunities can they thrive and reap fruitful outcomes, which may not be achieved by only maths skills. According to some anecdotal research carried out by Massechussett Universities, 70% of their graduates who are adept in maths fail in the marketplace due to the lack of visions and social relationships. When people have more diverse social relationships, they can expand their business targets for cooperating in tandem with higher levels of support. People can, accordingly, strive for success more constructively.
In conclusion, although mathematics is, to some extent, crucial, I am convinced that there are manifold factors that can uphold one’s success, including well-covered knowledge and skills as well as the nexus between luck and social span.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31962025316 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98575068925 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.978851665 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914188784235 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313478226884 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282795070419 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561964954394 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126092731533 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.