Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think it is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether it is fair for professionals in sports can be rewarded by a great deal of money that they deserve to have but other fields are not entitled to such benefits. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and give my partial support latter view.
On the one side, there are so many types of sport and competitions all around the world. Professionals who need to spend a lot of time to practice, to challenge themselves in order to become experts in their fields. If they want to achieve the valuable prizes, they have to force themselves in process. For instance, a bodybuilder has to spend a great deal of time practicing every day, having a special diet in order to meet the requirements of competitions. Awards are not only the way to honor sports players for their hard work but also encourage them to reach a higher level of the sport. Furthermore, the contestants can be people with disabilities. A big gift for them means everything, it could be a treasure for their lives and a recognition as normal people. It seems to be a good testimony for the reason that professionals can earn a big deal of more money.
On the other side, people argue that it is unfair for other vital fields such as doctors, researchers or teachers. For example, researchers only are rewarded when they find something new if it brings benefits to society or teacher, who can be honored if he or she transfers a wealth of knowledge to students just earn a little of salary. Otherwise, while doctors and teachers can work until they are 60 years of old, athletes normally stop competing at the 30s.
In conclusion, although I agree that professionals such as teachers and scientists should earn more money, I strongly believe that it is acceptable for talented sports athletes to earn higher incomes.
- The bar chart illustrates how male and female students chose subjects to study in a particular university in 2005 67
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports or musicians. 74
- The bar chart illustrates how much time men and women spending their time to do housework per day in the United Kingdom 61
- The bar chart illustrates how male and female students chose subjects to study in a particular university in 2005 67
- task 1 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and teachers can work until they are 60 years of old, athletes normally stop com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72615384615 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79489644779 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.215944405 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219992947362 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758692440266 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713156868754 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136377907497 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00564266675698 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.