successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, professionals in many sports earn significantly higher compared to their counterparts in other professions. People from other professional backgrounds often consider these financing to sportspersons unjust. However, I think successful sports personalities deserve what they are being paid.
Talking about the opponents arguments, the major one is questioning the significance of their profession in society. Sports is not considered a profession to perceive and often sidelined when compared with fields like medical and engineering. Also, the impact of sports on society is considered very little if any. Moreover, the morality of a sportssperson is always under scrutiny because of some bad experiences from past. These along with others like easy success,less hardwork are the main reasons given for opposing heavy payments to professionals in sports.
On the other hand,some people argue that sportsmen duely deserve what they are paid. The main reason being the opportunities which sportsprovide today. Many sports today have become global sports with followers across the world and generating large viewerships. In this scenario, they are best suited for the advertising market. Companies often gain heavy profits from sponsorships, generating revenues a part of which goes to players. Also, successful sportstars do not achieve overnight success. There goes a lot of hardwork,pain and training in achieving what they are right now. Thus, many people think positively about higher payments to achievers in sports.
Finally, some people question the money paid to sportspersons. I think they truly deserve this because of all the efforts they have done to reach there and also considering the fact that many corporate sectors are also benifitted from them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Sadrarouhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | morbymuku | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ngannguyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | WIWI UMAR | 61 | view |
- the chart below shows the amount of lesiure time enjoyed by males and females of different employement status. 67
- at the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the adavantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages ? 56
- some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. 61
- some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. 61
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel inEngland between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , less
...hese along with others like easy success,less hardwork are the main reasons given for...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
...essionals in sports. On the other hand,some people argue that sportsmen duely deser...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , pain
...ht success. There goes a lot of hardwork,pain and training in achieving what they are...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, thus, i think, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67041198502 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03694283525 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.78218251 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1111111111 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215064346285 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669825659883 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586389700764 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147120044943 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740387177684 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.01 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.