Successful sports professional can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Successful sports professional can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is inevitable that sports stars have higher income than people in other important fields. Some people think this is fair but other think it is unreasonable. Both sides have their different reasons.

On the one hand, successful athletes deserve to earn a great deal of money. First and foremost, they work under constant pressure. Few people can achieve it. Almost all of sports persons are innately talented, and, in order to become professionals, they must practice from a very young age and obey strict rules. Secondly, they have short career time, therefore, they need to make money for whole of life. If an accident happens, it could end their future success in sport. Last but not least, famous athletes have social impact, hence, they can encourage people to do exercise.

On the other hand, those working in other sectors like technology, science, etc should be paid equally to sportsman. Teachers and scientists demand high level of knowledge as well as lifelong studying. In addition, their jobs create sustainable value for society, however, their annual salary is less than a single match fee of football in India.

In my viewpoint, it is necessary to bridge the huge gap between athletes and other professions’ salary. Due to the equal role of every job, government should consider to enact policy to keep a balance.

To sum up, authorities should take action to lower the difference in income of sports persons and other careers.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-04 happyhappy 67 view
2019-12-12 Sadrarouhi 78 view
2019-10-02 ngannguyen 56 view
2019-09-30 WIWI UMAR 61 view
2019-09-29 Pgreat 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 164, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider enacting'.
Suggestion: consider enacting
...al role of every job, government should consider to enact policy to keep a balance. To sum u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, as well as, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11618257261 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61736607858 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.688796680498 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.542824773 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0625 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0625 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26314901444 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829823902148 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966024392537 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131824084116 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113781352555 0.056905535591 200% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.