The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different
countries over a twenty-year period.
The table compares the number of waste were produced, in millions of tonnes, by six nations, between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the amount of waste production increased in all countries. Besides, the US always had the highest number over twenty years.
There was a rapid rise in the amount of waste production, in the US, from 131 million tonnes in 1980 to reach a peak of 192 million tonnes in 2000. The production also climbed quickly, in Japan and Korea, from 28 and zero million tonnes in 1980 to 32 and 31 million tonnes in 1990, respectively. While the number, in Korea, dropped dramatically to 19 million tonnes, the amount, in Japan, went up gradually to 53 million tonnes in 2000.
The waste production slowly increased, in Poland and Portugal, from 4 and 2 million tonnes in 1980 to 6.6 and 5 million tonnes in 2000, respectively. The amount, in Ireland, decreased slightly from 0.6 million tonnes in 1980 to the bottom that empty in 1990. Although the production rose to the same number as Portugal in 2000, this level still was the lowest point at the end of the period.
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six differentcountries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 61
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 191.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70680628272 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53745819961 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 506.74238477 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5234578538 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354376536046 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159708628275 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049967847718 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216469335198 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289134532821 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.