The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different
countries over a twenty-year period.
The table compares the numbers of waste that were produced by six nations between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the amount of waste production increased in five out of the six countries. Besides, the US always produced the largest waste for over twenty years.
In this period, the waste of the US rapidly rose from 131 to 192 million tonnes. Between 1980 and 1990, waste production also climbed quickly, in Japan and Korea, from 28 to 32 and from zero to 31 million tonnes, respectively. In 2000, while Korea tended to cut its waste to 19 million tonnes, the waste of Japan went up gradually to 53 million tonnes.
Between 1980 and 2000, waste production slowly increased, in Poland and Portugal, from 4 to 6.6 and from 2 to 5 million tonnes, respectively. From 1980 to 1990, the waste of Ireland decreased slightly from 0.6 million tonnes to the bottom. In 2000, although the production rose to the same number as Portugal, this level still was the lowest point.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by day car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 56
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealandand Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 67
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 1615.20841683 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 168.0 315.596192385 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45180298321 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 176.041082164 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 506.74238477 44% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0500733101 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274604377693 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12736020606 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450385685963 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176121492936 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509735082629 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 50.2224549098 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.