The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012.
The given tables shed lights on club participants and the local inhabitants’ attitudes towards the newly-constructed cinema in 2012.
As can be seen from the tables, the majority of people were reported to have excellent experience at the new sites and those with poor review made up only a small percentage of survey participants.
When it comes to the cinema’s facility, up to 72% of club participants found it to be excellent, while more than a quarter said they were satisfied and only 2% reported having unpleasant experience. The numbers of that in terms of the general public is 64%, 24% and 8% respectively. In terms of the site’s quality, 40% of those from the general public group are satisfied, which is fourth times higher in comparison with those in the club.
With regard to information’s satisfaction level, while 66% of those from the general public ticked in the excellent box, only more than a half of members rated their experience as excellent, at 54%. Additionally, up to 16% of club participants and 14% of local residents reported having poor experience at the site.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-07 | nhattram39 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | nhattram39 | 56 | view |
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- When a new town is planned it is more important to develop public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows how two types of olive oil are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ce. The numbers of that in terms of the general public is 64%, 24% and 8% respectively. In te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of that in terms of the general public is 64%, 24% and 8% respectively. In term...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e site’s quality, 40% of those from the general public group are satisfied, which is fourth ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tion level, while 66% of those from the general public ticked in the excellent box, only more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 184.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02717391304 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08622446157 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 506.74238477 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.80139231 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132750190329 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687121390769 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356701528528 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829870524705 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349666517678 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.