The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate at least five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2002 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart sheds lights on the percentage of British residents whose consumption of fruits and vegetables are greater than five portions a day during the 2002-2010 period.
As can be seen from the graph, the consumptions of adults is nearly double that of children, and female adults eat slightly more fruits and vegetables than male.
Considering the data for women, a quarter of women in the UK ate at least five portions of fruits and vegetables everyday in 2002. Four years laters, in 2006, it then rose to 32% - the highest figure recognized in the whole chart before ending the period with a minimal drop to 27% in 2010.
At the same time, the data for male and children followed the same pattern as female. The proportion for men stood at 22%; 28% and 24% in 2002, 2006 and 2010 respectively, slightly lower than that of female from 3-5%. On the other hand, not many kids having more than five portions of veggies a day, its figures only account for 11% (2002), 16% (2006), and 14%(2010)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-12 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 67
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61797752809 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37789409462 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634831460674 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2914857027 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255158587302 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117655244272 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809954261928 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155423905467 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628909211469 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.