Task 2: International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages?
It is comprehensible that in many parts of the word, travel between countries has become extremely popular due to the overwhelming amount of profit from this smokeless industry as a marked milestone. Personally, I wholly believe that the benefits still surpass the drawbacks in this situation.
In spite of that fact that international tourism may result in a host of benefits to the development of regions, there are still some disadvantages. First of all, because tourist destinations witness a significant number of travelers. Consequently, the daily life of indigenous residents can be disturbed by several controversial issues such as the increase in crime rate, the disappearance of cultural identity and so on. Secondly, the development of travel does not only affect local residents but it also exerts an adverse influence on the locations where travelers visit. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies this circumstance, Son Doong cave is a popular location in this country but after the tourists visit too much, natural landscape has been somewhat affected by tourism activities.
I am convinced that there are still a great number of benefits from international travel. Because of the globalization, it facilitates overseas tourists to travel to other countries. There is no doubt that local destinations can become popular in the world and it is an effective way to promote the image of nations. Additionally, if the number of travelers increase dramatically, it can make an outstanding contribution to the income of citizens as well as government budget. The local authorities can allocate money to improve their infrastructure, thereby making the tourism of their countries could develop further. For instance, china attract a large number of travelers every years and they use money from these tourism activities effectively to improve their society.
In conclusion, although international tourism still has some potential disadvantages, I strongly agree that the benefits outperform the drawbacks in this case. However, the governments should figure out some viable solutions to maintained the sustainable development of travel in their nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | Bao Chau Phan | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | Black_rosie | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | Black_rosie | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | thuiinh | 69 | view |
- There are many types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important and should it be preserved or is international music that is heard everywhere nowadays more useful to a society? 78
- Task 2: The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices are harmful to individual and to the society they live in. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 84
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selectin 56
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...op further. For instance, china attract a large number of travelers every years and they use mone...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56838905775 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24009591851 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9393668312 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161893691222 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535242522287 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304201075523 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955787016708 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319356423949 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.