Task 2 It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks Do you agree or disagree with this statement

Some people argue that certain residential territories such as cities and towns would
benefit from possessing enormous outdoor structures like squares and parks.
Similarly, I strongly believe these places are to be profitable for both individuals and
societies.

Given the hectic and busy lifestyle practiced by virtually everyone, numerous people
nowadays tend to suffer from a lack of time to spend with their families. To this end,
parks may prove advantageous as they enable parents and children to relish some
quality time together, hence yielding highly boosted familial bonds. Furthermore,
deemed as the lungs of the cities, parks are bound to lead people down a much
healthier path of life. Teeming with trees, these green spaces would absorb carbon
dioxide abounding in the atmosphere and return oxygen instead, in the long run,
assisting people with their respiratory problems.

At a societal level, these public places might be profitable as they appeal to a wide
array of tourists who carve for architecturally rich structures such as squares. In my
city for instance, have already built quite a few phenomenal squares, the authorities
have increasingly reaped the rewards from the influx of tourist seeking to visit these
captivating places. Additionally, squares might even resurrect some old figures who
once played a substantial role in nations’ history and culture. These forgotten
ancestors of us might be revived if squares are equipped with some structures, such
as statues and sculptures, which may remind people of their forebears.

Nonetheless, some people may suggest that constructing parks and squares might
wreak havoc on already congested cities and towns, as these structures are likely to
occupy the spaces deemed necessary for residential and business complexes.
However, I believe peoples’ heath and history should be prioritized over any other
thing.

In conclusion, I think vast open-air places such as parks and squares are highly likely
to be beneficial both socially and individually.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, similarly, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64968152866 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86754393646 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2734308008 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.461538462 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171558662177 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577437368744 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417559492756 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0430834120024 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399995786419 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.