Task 2: Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
The rising production of goods as well as materials continues to be a controversial topic in this modern age. While some claim that this should be a national priority, I do not agree as there are more important aspects need to be improved by the government.
It is undeniable that health of inhabitants is always among the top concerns of a country. As can be seen, in some remoted and moutainous regions, people still struggle to have health assessments because of the lack of hospital or medical centre. In addition, the hospital in urban area nowadays may offer such high payments that citizens cannot afford of. As a result, the data on people getting ailment or even fatality would somehow affect the stability and position of one country. Moreover, the assurance of inhabitant's health quality could contribute to the strong workforce that is able to serve the producing progress.
Aside from medical issue, education also plays a vital role to the enhancement of the economic growth. When students are well equipped with diverse along with academic knowledge, they would likely have a chance of becoming skillful employees in the future. The higher standard of workers generates a better quality of products and both of them could contribute to the development of the economy. Needless to say, government should allocate more money to improve the educational programs that subsequently elevate the quality of workers.
In conclusion, I do not stand for the view that focusing on materials and goods production is an essential goal of every country. The government should concentrate on two other aspects which are education and health care so that perhaps they could benefit the production strategy with higher quality of workers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1338028169 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77109767868 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0273512786 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.153846154 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188801921718 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601055200359 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756799908226 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118219482004 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765652298668 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.