In recent years, there have been two conflicting views on the impacts of state-of-the-art technology on social interactions. Some consider that technological advancements have a positive influence on human relationships while others contend that they have adverse effects. In my opinion, I agree with the second point of view, for the drawbacks of technological development far outweigh its benefits.
On the one hand, those who are more sanguine about the effects of technological development on human relationship believe that modern technology has shortened the distance among people and made the world smaller. They assert this trend has a positive influence on human relationship. For example, telephones and the Internet allow business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Because of these technological devices, not only can business people reduce the cost of long-distance call but they can also build and maintain long-lasting relationship with clients. Considering the convenience caused by the cutting-edge technology, some people argue that the overall impact of technology has been positive.
On the other hand, opponents think technology would adversely affect human relationship. New communication technologies such as smart phones and online apps result in social isolation and reduction of real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these “virtual” relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships. Due to the negative impacts of technology, people consider it necessary to be aware of the danger of over-reliance on technology.
In conclusion, people have different views on how technology has altered the connectivity between people. Some think of it as a way to facilitate human interaction, yet others fear the development of technology will become a stumbling block to establishing a healthy human relation. In my view, the drawbacks outweigh much more than the benefits produced by technology. Hence, it is recommended that people should be extremely cautious about their reliance on technology.
- the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information below by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles. 78
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68615384615 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31249883331 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2227683502 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302070481776 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925433029824 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379378787183 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175262769862 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505392350324 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.