Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a

Technology is flourishing by leaps and bounds in each and every field and communication is not the exception. However, this tremendous change in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded fruitful straightforwardly because of its certain drawbacks which spark debate on its positive and negative effects.
To embark on, with regards to positive development, one of the prominent benefits is that technology has made communication easier and comfortable. At present, people are hardly one click away from the nears and dears one because of the modern developments like Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp and social networking sites, like facebook. These advancements have made everyone social up to much extent. Secondly, there are tremendous chances in the way of letters and telegrams were sent and in making calls. People used to stand in long queues on S.T.D and I.S.D booth but now mobile phone and advanced gizmos facilitate everyone to interact freely.
On the other hand, certain drawbacks cannot be ignored like today’ people not only spend a long time in using computers but also do not prefer to meet their friends and relatives face to face leading to a faded relationship. For instance, one of my childhood friends preferred to meet me personally on different occasions like a festival and on birthdays but nowadays, she sends messages for wishing me and send greetings on my mail. Even most of the family members are suffering from asphyxia, a disease sparks from isolation. This is really a worrisome issue for the imitate relationships.
To sum up, despite having numerous drawbacks, no one can afford to turn face from this ever fast modern technology that has to facilitate our lives.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on its positive and negative effects. To embark on, with regards to positive d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...vancements have made everyone social up to much extent. Secondly, there are tremen...
^^
Line 2, column 565, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: D
...ple used to stand in long queues on S.T.D and I.S.D booth but now mobile phone an...
^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: D
...o stand in long queues on S.T.D and I.S.D booth but now mobile phone and advanced...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acilitate everyone to interact freely. On the other hand, certain drawbacks can...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n. This is really a worrisome issue for the imitate relationships. To sum up, despi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e issue for the imitate relationships. To sum up, despite having numerous drawb...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19565217391 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91816731582 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3101512118 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204589541928 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644824623117 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389828509126 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113070728941 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473253073306 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.