Task 2: Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging.. Discuss both the views and give your opinion
Plastic bag is a significant concern due to the drawbacks followed which are inevitable. Many people argue that manufacturers and supermarkets must propose a plan in order to halt the rising of plastic bag. Meanwhile, others think that purchasers have a responsibility to avoid packaged products. Both views will be discussed in this essay.
Companies and supermarkets manage their product and control packaging. They produce a tremendous amount of plastic bag to encourage their sales and the bag is very convenience (cheap, portable, light weight, etc.) However, plastic is not friendly with environment because it takes a long period of time to be tackle (average 100 years). Thus, solution should be taken to decrease amount of plastic packages by using biological plastic bag for example. In addition, supermarkets can encourage customer avoid plastic bag with the cloth bag which is fashionable but more expensive or free 1% of total bills when they don’t use plastic bag. We can see that if manufacturers don’t have strategy to reduce packaging, tons of plastic will be produced because of customer’s habits.
Customers also play a vital role in reducing plastic bag. Because the more people uses plastic bag, the more they are produced. By contract, when customers comprehend about how harmful it is, they will have a concept to reduce packaged products. Customers should be those who do the actions and they are the roots of the issue. For instant, people can bring their own bottles to accommodate the drink instead of plastic can or they can go shopping online. All in all, unless purchasers stop using plastic, there is no production.
To summarize, both manufactures and people have a responsibility to reducing packaging of goods and the problem should be handled by their collaborative efforts.
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 56
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 61
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future 41
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...ag is very convenience cheap, portable, light weight, etc. However, plastic is not friendly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ith environment because it takes a long period of time to be tackle average 100 years. Thus, s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...handled by their collaborative efforts.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24914675768 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93949991718 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563139931741 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3290253835 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4705882353 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212439456291 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810908920497 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685875395076 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174077168686 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702259138551 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.