Task 2 Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Task 2: Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that oral communication is considered to be effective in contrast to written communication. In my point of view, I would agree with this statement regarding its effectiveness in understanding and progressing communication.
First of all, one of the most beneficial factors is its easy context, when a spoken speech conveys ideas effectively as it involves both mime and gestures in order to express emotions and thoughts clearly. Dating, for instance, usually happens through face-to-face conversations rather than some social media apps at home because emotion icons, photos or videos can not be as impressive as a real smile during a dinner date. Another thing is that offline meetings, especially important ones, require a lot of verbal discussions in terms of exchanging ideas constantly and therefore quickly reaching final decisions.
Secondly, having a lot of talks before, people would improve a large number of soft skills such as critical thinking and fluency. It is necessary for workplaces, in presentations or for conversations with people you do not know as it helps us to make a good impression on people and communicate politely. For example, singers or rappers also need speaking skill at a good level. The tone of someone’s voice with diverse lexical resources can powerfully convey a wide range of emotions, and that is why some people are able to inspire and influence others simply through a powerful speech, a song.
To conclude, for the reasons cited above, it seems to me that spoken communication is more effective than written communication as it conveys the speaker’s both information and emotions.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-25 trpg143 78 view
2024-01-15 dau 56 view
2024-01-15 dau 56 view
2024-01-03 hau le 73 view
2024-01-03 hau le 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is believed that oral communication i...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tanding and progressing communication. First of all, one of the most beneficial...
^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t of talks before, people would improve a large number of soft skills such as critical thinking a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ply through a powerful speech, a song. To conclude, for the reasons cited above...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, another thing, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27376425856 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12138816705 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653992395437 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9516423076 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.7 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189541042445 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685104845009 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859543127642 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127909758761 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941317181685 0.056905535591 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is believed that oral communication i...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tanding and progressing communication. First of all, one of the most beneficial...
^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t of talks before, people would improve a large number of soft skills such as critical thinking a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ply through a powerful speech, a song. To conclude, for the reasons cited above...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, another thing, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27376425856 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12138816705 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653992395437 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9516423076 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.7 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189541042445 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685104845009 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859543127642 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127909758761 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941317181685 0.056905535591 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.