Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Write at least 250 words.
In this contemporary world, there are many people believed that government or country need spend more than on skills and learn for their future career as practical work intstead of focus too much on university education. From my perspective, this essay has some advantages but this is can make bad effect on society and this essay will discuss about that and conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training. First, government subsidies for training are believed to equalize opportunities working among young adolescents regardless of their background family. This vocational training support, presumably tends not only to increas the overall experience rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority when they didn’t had engough money for study in university, which promotes an egalitarian society. Second, vocational training would probably result higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, they are not have benefis if they are not have study background as study in university and gain new knowledge. First, government spend more money than vocational training would likely correspond with tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from fees or tuition, schools could over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, nations spend more money than support skills and training tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in develop themselves, thereby adding great burden for government and school’s staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent their time for searching information about their future career and suitable course. It, instead, would be a more financial for study or training viable option if the resources were focused on less privileged yet gifted students.
In conclusion, people want to focus more on skills but they are not know knowledge and university is one of the most important part for all skills they need to have in workplace. In my opininon, this argument has many disadvantages and I disagree with that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-22 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | chile | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 61 | view |
- The bar chart and the pie chart compare pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries between 2009 and 2019 as well as a breakdown of each pineapple s consumer cost in 2019
- The best way for a government to prepare for the future is to invest in young people To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the percentage of students on an adult education centre taking various courses offered in 1985 and this year Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of kind of age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 456, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...feeling of inferiority when they didn’t had engough money for study in university, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...y nations. Nevertheless, they are not have benefis if they are not have study back...
^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ey are not have benefis if they are not have study background as study in university...
^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...o focus more on skills but they are not know knowledge and university is one of the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...his argument has many disadvantages and I disagree with that.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48837209302 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86308874122 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.664003904 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.714285714 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244319550372 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885681204557 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717472431797 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146811703491 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333437822524 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.