Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities, which are played alone. To what extent to you agree or disagree?
Different skills are required to attain the objective of any activity. Activities which are played in group propel one to learn other skills for life than activities that are played solo. I totally agree to the above statement and would like to discuss the same in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, man is a social animal who loves to mingle with its own group. If man keeps himself or herself aloof, the learning gets deteriorated. The more the man socializes, the better he or she becomes. For instance, if a child is allowed to play with friends, he or she develops holistically. The skills that are learned in team are co-operation, communication, leadership, team spirit, patience, creative, and management. These skills help the child to be successful in other spheres of life. The employers always hire the candidates who carry skills that are required to make work atmosphere positive. Despite having the appropriate qualifications, candidates are rejected due to fewer skills. So, to be a skill oriented has become pre-requisite to get employed.
On the other hand, activities that are played alone keep the learning at bay. One becomes not only rigid but also a convergent thinker. For example, some parents do not permit their wards to mingle with others. They show reluctance because they feel that their child may fall into a bad company. This attitude of the folks hampers the development of that child. The child begins to remain in isolation, and create his or her own world. Thus, he or she hesitates to be a part of any group. The chances of becoming introvert are on rise which puts him or her in to the domain of inflexibility.
To sum up, activities that are done in a group have loads of advantages. Moreover, it pushes one to become skilled to face any challenges which come across in life.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both the views and giv 61
- movie making budget 11
- expenditure on a movie-making process. 84
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 67
- Number of men and women in different evening courses 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88461538462 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81137067326 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.5579241407 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.2727272727 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1818181818 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31818181818 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2015725027 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504511812919 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696850274794 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13711000647 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774707337222 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.