Technology allows food to be produced in greater quantities and at lower prices. Some people believe this is a positive development, while others fell that the change is harmful.
A highly controversial issue today relates to development in technology at food. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then give my opinion on the matter.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of evolution machinery at food considerably outweigh its disadvantages. the main reason for believing this is that the use of technology will help people save their time. It is possible to say that the advancement of hi-tech at food can bring enough time for a busy person. One good illustration of this is when entrepreneurs are working, they often have a habit of eating fast food at lunch because for them the preparation of lunch will take a lot of time.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact, the use of technology at food will not benefit in health. People often have this opinion because they think the advancement of hi-tech at food will contain many preservatives which directly harms human health. A second point is that the body of human cannot absorb nutrients from food. A particularly good example here is from fast food, which has a lot of bad health effects, especially for older people when they eat fast food, they are at high risk of heart disease.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that the use of technology at food is not justified. This is because the development of food technology brings fewer benefits than negative which causes cancer in humans.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of European secondary school pupils learning languages 60
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle, in order to prevent illness rather than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this and give your own opinion. 56
- Technology allows food to be produced in greater quantities and at lower prices. Some people believe this is a positive development, while others fell that the change is harmful. 56
- Some people said the government should not spend money on building theaters and sports stadiums. It should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...onsiderably outweigh its disadvantages. the main reason for believing this is that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, then, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71167883212 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66182522885 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7728884174 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2142857143 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215616642369 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863046889675 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337250009878 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144889302589 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147981308455 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.