Teenagers should be allowed to use phones at an early age. Do you agree or disagree?
In the modern age, with the development of technology, the age of phone users is decreasing gradually. Despite the fact that the trend can be beneficial to some people, I strongly disagree with the permission for teenagers to use mobile devices at such a young age.
To begin with, children should not be allowed to own a mobile phone at an early age due to the exposure of some underage content on the Internet. Although big media corporations argue that they have their censorship team to eliminate any inappropriate content, some might not be completely deleted and this poses an implicit threat to young users. One example is Tik Tok, the platform which has loose age restrictions as well as a variety of unsuitable videos, from violent to unethical content.
Furthermore, by not allowing teenagers to use mobile devices, parents partly help their kids to concentrate more on their studies. Nowadays, there are a plethora of new apps and games online, which can be easily downloaded to a smartphone. Children, on one hand, can be easily addicted to such interesting games; hence, this may lead to their bad performance at school because of spending too much time on their phones. Parents’ action to prevent their kids’ addiction to mobile devices as soon as possible can be seen as useful and thoughtful in the future.
In conclusion, mobile phones are one of the greatest inventions of humans. Nonetheless, when kids of such a young age get to use phones, it can do more harm than good to both users as well as their family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...an do more harm than good to both users as well as their family.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, may, nonetheless, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87452471483 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76356024882 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1009682129 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298494180267 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109158599426 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858972341456 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17408501954 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589419237523 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.