Television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children also less well educated today.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The effective way of learning in children is always a controversial in the society. But, these day's television also considered as a learning tool and children are paying much attention to television these days. In this current context, I'm going to discuss about the television advantages and disadvantages in terms of learning strategies.

To begin With, It is certainly true, the knowledge gained from television will fix in the mind and hold forever when compared with traditional learning methodologies. A recent research conducted on learning methodologies says, the children who acquired knowledge from television are more luminous than reading from books. For instance, children can remember more knowledge from practical skills than bookish knowledge because they are visualizing it. Therefore, Visualization plays vital role in refreshing memory and retain knowledge, this can be accomplished with television.

On the other hand, there are few consequences behind television, the programs from television visualized both audio and video, this can diminish the children imagination abilities. Unlike television, Books offer set of words, explanation and background information and leaves the creating and imagination part to the children. This can incur thoughtfulness, perceptibility and invention capacity in children's which is crucial. Thus, reading a book should be mandatory measure to kids which is irreplaceable with television and any other objects.

To sum up, the value of reading book and watching TV are not comparable as the are two different learning styles. Moreover the imagination skills, reading books is outweighs watching television significantly. Lastly, the children are no more less educated today, they are enriched with knowledge, self-esteem and self- developmental skills. And, they are capable enough to pick the right choice for acquiring knowledge.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...ontroversial in the society. But, these days television also considered as a learnin...
^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...on these days. In this current context, Im going to discuss about the television a...
^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...k and watching TV are not comparable as the are two different learning styles. Moreover...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... the are two different learning styles. Moreover the imagination skills, reading books i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...nificantly. Lastly, the children are no more less educated today, they are enriched with ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79928315412 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17383866717 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0448846593 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251496940243 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083025298836 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409243748913 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150335506212 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321501893211 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.