There are fewer controls on the designs and construction of home and office buildings. So people can build them whatever they like.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, building homes and offices is less controlled by the government in terms of the design and construction. While there are many benefits for that, I believe that the drawbacks far outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, letting people choose the designs of their homes and offices according to their own taste can lead to a sense of satisfaction. For example, some people prefer to have a wide garden rather than a big house, while others do not. Moreover, when there is less control over the way of construction of a building, people will be able to choose the suitable building materials according to their affordability. For instance, youngsters may opt to build their homes using cheap red bricks instead of using highly expensive concrete.
On the other hand, one of the negative consequences of the lack of the government's control over building construction is that this can have a great negative impact on the environment. To illustrate more, using such a material mentioned above increases the possibility of soil erosion, which may lead to environmental catastrophic effects. Furthermore, when people are allowed to choose the design of their homes and offices, they may not take into consideration the designs that help in heat preservation, despite the importance of this property especially in countries with cold weather. In contrast, if the government had more control on defining the design of buildings, this would be more advantageous for the sake of people's safety and welfare.
In conclusion, although choosing people for their buildings design and construction may seem to be suitable for many regarding affordability and taste satisfaction, I have a firm belief that the government control can lead to more benefits for the society as well as the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-02 | rania sayed ahmed | 67 | view |
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out. In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 61
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- There are fewer controls on the designs and construction of home and office buildings. So people can build them whatever they like.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The increase in tourism is causing environmental problems. What problems has tourism brought to the environment? What can be done to solve these problems? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad of using highly expensive concrete. On the other hand, one of the negative c...
^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...re. In conclusion, although choosing people for their buildings design and construc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21034482759 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03696802616 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527586206897 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8383237026 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.363636364 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0909090909 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284396541152 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111665278967 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631727137638 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178440118707 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383977241936 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.