There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, thanks to developed technologies such as computers and the internet, people tend to work and study from their home. Although I accepted that this trend has some positive points, I think the adverse effects are more significant.
Computer systems have many benefits, including accessibility and affordability, which have facilitated students and workers to work remotely. In fact, this working method could save time due to time reduction, which was wasted for traveling to schools or workplaces. As a result, distance activities lead to the mitigation of living costs because the fuel costs will be diminished. In addition to the benefits mentioned above, remote working allows students and employees to implement their own daily schedule and does not force them to do their tasks in a compulsory time frame. Take a student tending to study at nights as an example. He could study and do his homework more efficiently due to the accessibility of online educational videos uploaded on the internet.
Although studying and working from home has some advantages, from my point of view the adverse effects are more remarkable. In other words, remote working not only reduces communication but also engenders severe physical and mental illnesses, which may cause dire consequences. Mental problems such as desperation may compromise the people’s lifelong and subside their life expectations. In order to surmount these problems, individuals, including students and workers, should participate in group teams to surge their morale. Moreover, physical issues such as muscle cramping and eye sour are prevailing problems derived from constant computer using. Take a worker who is forced to work with a computer as an example he looks to a computer screen for almost eight hours per day to complete his tasks; however, the blue radiation released could damage his eyes and cause eye drying disorders.
To sum up, for the reasons mentioned above I think the disadvantage of working and studying from home outweighs the advantages although this technology is cheap and accessible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | vyhanh | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | fatemeh norouzi | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | fatemeh norouzi | view | |
| 2020-11-13 | fatemeh norouzi | 89 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- the bar chart shows the average number of hours per week that men and women spend doing activities around the home 69
- In this fast changing world distance learning and working have become one of the most challengeable issues Although I accepted the positive points of this trend I believe negative effects are more significant 56
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare people to work in the future 62
- some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with help that is not financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, i think, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38109756098 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88997213655 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606707317073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.950050875 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369437250188 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109723279171 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962036549027 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241503394804 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748417177112 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.