There is no future for public transport, because travelling by car is so much more convenient.Write your composition.
It is undoubtedly true that personal vehicle is one of the humanity's most important invention in a last few decades but it can lead to the loss of public transport. While i agree that car is really convenient, i believe public transportation will still flourish.
In the one hand, the comfort and easiness of car should not be underestimated. First of all, when it comes to the transportation, it is needless to say that personal mean of transport is one of the most convenient means of transport. While the public transport has it fixed schedule, which is really uncomfortable, cars give men a chance to control their propagation time and the duration of the trips. By way of illustration, the majority of public transportations does not work at late night. Secondly, there seems to be some evidences that car is a symbol of power, wealthy and modern lifestyle. In many countries, especially the impoverished one, car is reportedly being owned by affluent people. Lastly, private driving help to avoid being involved in some social castatrophes. Robbery, assault or pickpocketing, to mention but a few.
Nevertheless, i believe there is always a place for public transportation. Firstly, beside the benefit it brings, car also has some drawbacks. Private vehicles are allegedly responsible for traffic congestion or air pollution due to the exhaust fumes discharging from it. Secondly, along with the growth of environmental protection campaign, people are encouraged to use public transport such as bus or train with the aim of limiting the discharging of emissions. Lastly, using pubic transport is money saving. Many people cannot afford to buy a car or car-related expenses. Gas or maintenance fee are good case in point
To sum up, car is a convenient way of transport as it help us control our time and prevent some social evil, it also a wealthy symbol. But it cannot replace the public transports because of the expensive and some environmental problems
- about streamer 71
- discuss both the positive and negative aspects of mobile phones 56
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... to the loss of public transport. While i agree that car is really convenient, i ...
^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... i agree that car is really convenient, i believe public transportation will stil...
^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...o mention but a few. Nevertheless, i believe there is always a place for pub...
^
Line 9, column 479, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...discharging of emissions. Lastly, using pubic transport is money saving. Many people ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, while, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09567901235 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16091577045 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2241763946 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2179245066 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692183089327 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457385134997 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140661585541 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131569824172 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.