There is a problem today that copyright materials such as music, films and books are freely available on the internet with the result that the owners of the works lose money.
Do you feel that this is a good or a bad thing?
Thanks to the increment of Internet, we can enjoy free music, films, books and art works, which certainly cannot provide income for the owners. Therefore, this remains a source of constant debate on the copyright of artworks. Although I agree that artists should be compensated for their works, I still believe that some artworks can be published for free.
First and foremost, a successful artist these days must be well-known, widely-recognized prior to they want to earn money from public while online publications can boost their popularity. Many young people understand this secret and become idols all over the world by distributing licensed work online. For example, they spread their songs to 100 million people in only 1 hour, which was hardly achieved in the past. When their work is popular, they can make their livings by advertising, being representatives of super brands or it's YouTube, who pays according to the number of views.
On the other hands, this type of distribution has some negative consequences. It is clear that the owners have to spend their time, effort to make their works or even hire facilities, agencies to publish them. In the past, singers or song writers' income was from selling cassette of music, selling show tickets,... while such works nowadays are easily pirated and posted for all, which leads to the fact that a significant amount of money and time may be lost. It is unfair for artists that their creativity and brainpower are not as well paid as it is deserved.
In conclusion, it may be stated that the online circulation of copyrighted work has both beneficial and harmful consequences. In my opinion, it depends on the artists who can decide whether their works can be published free or not. New artists needing the recognition from community can choose free online dissemination while others may prefer that their works are accessed only by paying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-12 | zanzendegi | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | zanzendegi | 90 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...y cannot provide income for the owners. Therefore this remains a source of constant debat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I still believe that some artworks can be published for free. First and fore...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... cassette of music, selling show tickets,... while such works nowadays are easily ...
^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to free'
Suggestion: to free
...e recognition from community can choose free online dissemination while others may p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03154574132 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67237676756 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599369085174 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1614912688 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09619716207 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373716356198 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273781505879 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640012098731 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183722606593 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.