In today’s competitive world, the only thing that matters to marketers is the ability to make a product stand out from the lot. To achieve this, they go to great lengths to impress the viewers, regardless of their age, which make children the main victim. Although advertisements affect children in various ways, I believe advertisements should be carefully chosen and managed.
On the one hand, the negative impacts of advertisements on the eating habits and personality of the child are numerous. In terms of personality, advertisements portray stunts to make the product more appealing, and thus children try to imitate the same kinds of act, leading to hurt themselves. Advertisements can also spoil children by persuading them to fall for the thing they don’t even need or by making children keep badgering their parents to purchase whatever they see on ads. Another negative influence of advertising is on the eating habits of the children. Marketers always advertise junk foods that are visually eye-catching. The result of this is the impulse buying habit in young minds that may cost their health and physical development.
On the other hand, to mitigate the impact, advertisers must consider some factors like age and health of the viewers especially young ones whose lifestyle may be affected in some way. In respect to age, some types of advertisements must be presented at certain time of day when children are at school or at bed, so they may be less exposed to. Another factor that advertisers must bear in mind is the health of the children who are supposed to eat products having less nutritious value, which in turn lead to their lack of mental and physical function. Therefore, advertisers must be very cautious about the things they advertise.
In conclusion, I do agree that advertising has negative influence on the beautiful mind of children, but I think these negative consequences of advertisement can be managed and controlled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10903426791 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94517931389 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566978193146 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9246223544 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374351857908 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132300629697 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880086776685 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23607619461 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311791431681 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.