For many under developed countries, it is an immense help to receive resources like, food, medical aid and or military assistance from highly capitalized countries. Mostly believe that this approach does not only have positive effects to the receiver but to the giver as well. Apart from that this approach also has negative feedbacks from economists may it be from the receiving party or to the accepting party.
One of the biggest detrimental factor is it makes a nation more susceptible to penetration by super power countries. Resources like natural oil or minerals may be an equivalent to payment for accepting help. These resources who help promote economic status will be used by foreign land and once they are done will leave a third world country barren.
Another major effect is co-dependency. Most of the under developed countries if not all, tends to neglect responsibilities to their native land after acquisition of international supports. They rely on the biggest help they can claim from other great nations and thereby limiting their duties.
However, on the lighter side, countries who support other countries promote alliance and allegiance. An example is military aid wherein industrialized nations provide armed supports to third world countries to fight dominions from terrorists. By this approach third world countries pledge their economic support for their allied countries.
To summarize, countries accepting support from other countries have the benefits and also doubts. They should be cautious politically and economically in accepting help whether it is an act of benevolence or just another political strategy.
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011. 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Computerized data collection can be justified even though it endangers the rights of individuals Do you agree or disagree with the statement 82
- Children today spend more time watching television than they did in the pastDescribe some of the advantages and disadvantages of television for children. 22
- It is important to lean the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.to what extend do you agree and disagree with this opinion?what sort of punishment should parents and teachers be a 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
For many under developed countries, it i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iving party or to the accepting party. One of the biggest detrimental factor is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll leave a third world country barren. Another major effect is co-dependency. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons and thereby limiting their duties. However, on the lighter side, countries ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic support for their allied countries. To summarize, countries accepting suppor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, third, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.453125 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87456475985 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1975273745 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272864226853 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956474281418 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834612365177 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150984544283 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056232745317 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.