These days people pay more attention to artists (writers, painters and so on) and give less importance to science and technology.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There was a time we viewed the mathematic paintings of Leonardo Da Vinci and the literary thesis of Goethe as the contemporary norms. Never would I underestimate such extraordinaire, rather, I claim so with regard to those masterpieces’ fusion of artistic and scientific values. Yet, as the discrepancy between those two elements widens, a battle is ignited for the Holy Grail of public attention. In this age, my personal observation is that this precarious balance is leaning towards art.
Just as art and science once were intertwined, they both used to be the privilege of prestige, their publication exceeding the budget of anyone but the prosperous man. Since then, arts have evolved and, in fact, fuelled a complete cultural revolution, out of which the reign of populism is championed. Truly, our headlines, be it of the mainstream spreadsheets or lesser known tabloids, are littered with news concerning the pop culture, overshadowing any other news. As a testament, the finale of American Idols reported considerably more public votes than the presidential election that year, which is a tragic irony for journalism once on their moral high ground now succumbing to the profits from popular topics. Science, too in such onslaught, is obscured in the domination of this branch of arts, any of its advancements drowned amidst reviews of movies and the obsession over beloved figures.
In comparison with arts, the crumbling popularity of science can be attributed to its past zeitgeist of exclusion persisting till the present. Scientist papers, in such tune, obstruct readers with its gratuitous jargons at the compromise of inclusionary and coherent prose. Moreover, Schrodinger’s quantum physics mystifies the common public while the anthropologic excavation in Egypt seemingly bears no repercussions on our daily lives. Therefore, not only are the writings at fault, their contents are, to the laypersons, deeply unappealing, which is further perpetuated by specialists’ disinterest in welcoming outsiders in their fields. Consequently, scientific and technological circulations resonate not with and pique the interest not in the uninitiated but those aficionados already part of the circles of insiders. One may argue that from time to time, their successes do triumph over Hollywood personalities and steal from them the front pages, such as the moon landing or the launching of new iPhones. Yet such is interim at best and, after a while when enthusiasm dampens and science is once again an ethereal reclusive, we avert our attention back to the love affairs of rising stars. Profess our allegiance to science and technology as we may, we have a penchant for them only in Star Wars, Breaking Bad and The Martian, otherwise registered under the broad umbrella of sci-fi movies – a new glamourous derivative of arts.
In conclusion, I reckon humanities, in the perpetual race with science, have emerged victorious in our age. However, we should learn to recognize this harrowing reality for our reluctance to acquaint ourselves with scientific and technological advancements may spell our demise. Perhaps for once may mankind emulate the wisdom of the old masters and, if not totally fuse, reach a harmonious balance between these two fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-04 | duongntt94 | 11 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 69
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 79
- These days people pay more attention to artists (writers, painters and so on) and give less importance to science and technology.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s or lesser known tabloids, are littered with news concerning the pop culture, ov...
^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...e obsession over beloved figures. In comparison with arts, the crumbling popularity of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, i reckon, in conclusion, in fact, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2772.0 1615.20841683 172% => OK
No of words: 515.0 315.596192385 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38252427184 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14361316074 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 176.041082164 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617475728155 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 506.74238477 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3934004625 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.6 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0440534259605 0.244688304435 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0119272059688 0.084324248473 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0164893855742 0.0667982634062 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0250180967225 0.151304729494 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00886867172543 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 172.0 78.4519038076 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.