Today, anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society?

Essay topics:

Today, anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society?

Cellular phones have become an essential accessory for daily usage nowadays. However, people tend to overuse this gadget for answering calls even regardless to their work hours. Thus, such tendency is bringing negative effects to individuals and the society.

To begin with, it is true that mobile phones have brought communication to a new height these days. The convenience of using this device is undeniable for human in this century. Since many manufacturers are pushing hard to make this communicating device more and more compact continuously, people are now easier to carry along their phones at any time they go out of their accommodations. Thus, this small accessory allows individuals to stay connected to their acquaintances in the most convenient way thanks to its mobility. Furthermore, unlike landline mechanical phones, the mobile phones enable people to get into conversations even at the farthest place on Earth because the signal reception is now worldwide established.

However, the overuse of cell phones is delivering bad impacts on the users and society. Firstly, this trend is making people distracted from their work. By spending too much time on answering calls, individuals cannot focus on the task they are doing. As a result, this lack of concentration leads to bad outcomes at people’s workplaces. Secondly, the habit of using mobile phones is slowly destroying individuals’ socializing skills every day. Scientific surveys have indicated that 40% of the people loses their confidence and ability to talk to other individuals in person, which is tremendously damaging their social network and experience.

In conclusion, while mobile phones offer several perks when using, sticking too long with this accessory could bring negative effects on both people and the society.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-07 Nhi Ngo 84 view
2018-06-21 drtruong92 67 view
2018-02-05 Thira 84 view
2017-07-23 haphan 90 view
Essays by user drtruong92 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48398576512 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98097886218 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2823179044 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297317715176 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093145923751 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363387909443 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176167759988 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188060974548 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.