Today food travels thousands of miles before it reaches customers. Why is this so? Is this a positive or negative trend?
In this era, food is transported a long distance before meeting its consumers. This development takes place thanks to the advancement in preservation techniques and efficient transportation of food. Personally, despite some trivial effect on the environment, this trend is generally positive
Food can be carried on massive routes because of the evolution of refrigeration and transportation. Since its introduction, refrigeration has evolved to the point of reaching the optimum as it consumes less energy for more effective cooling, helping preserve food an extended period. Moreover, transportation is now immensely energy-efficient, being able to carry a host of goods at a lower cost of fuel. When these two factors align, food can now be transported worldwide, creating the mentioned development
By and large, this development brings a large scale of benefits to both customers and manufacturers while posing some threats to the environment. For customers, food that is not locally grown in one nation is now can be consumed, boosting the spending per capita and provide them more choices and satisfaction. In addition, manufacturers can observe a huge surge in demand, allowing them to escalate production and gaining more profit. Nonetheless, this development entails a greater amount of gas such as nitrogen and carbon dioxide released from transporations, which is immensely devastating for the ecosystem, a problem that the world has yet to give a solution
To conclude, it is fascinating to see food traveling internationally before reaching its cutomers with the core fosters being people’s demand and techonogy. Although this development may carry the risk of increasing the carbon footprint, it is still dwarfed by the positivity for multiple reasons . Specifically, the further the food is transported, the more cuisines being eaten in one nation, which helps manufacturers gain more profit
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays in many countries more and more people are spending their time away from their families Why is this What are the effects on themselves and on their families 84
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d by the positivity for multiple reasons . Specifically, the further the food is t...
^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the further the'. Did you mean 'further the'?
Suggestion: further the
...ty for multiple reasons . Specifically, the further the food is transported, the more cuisines ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, while, in addition, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58904109589 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35358229785 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.9254851921 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.363636364 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213372523698 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844555454449 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620724707634 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143911002365 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811930830991 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.