Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not real needs of the society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is actually true that advertisement makes a great effect on personal habits to buy products unnecessarily. In the majority of youth Indonesian female, for example, they are absolutely keen to purchase new trend of Samsung mobile even though they already had a last-released type of phone. They unconsciously buy in order to follow on what the trend consumes.
In addition, advertisements are not only being helped by social trends but also by the slogan they create, so the sales can boost wildly. The expert advertisers often renounce branding slogan that hopefully could be appealed by the targeted consumers. Nike is the best example of that. Majority of immature athletes are attracted by "Just do it" Nike motto. Some of them feel that proverb can strengthen their confidence on a field and motivate them when they give up. As a result, they will automatically want to wear that product despite they already had two or five collections.
Moreover in another secret of successful trick to sell is they way advertisement denounce a promise. Healthy drink producers for instance, they always approach the customers with a confident suggestion that the product can reduce fat and strengthen the vitality. The common consumers believe that promise as a fact without a doubt at all. Finally, the laziest and fatty consumers may buy that bites even though they do not sure about what the result will be.
In another hand, some of people may disagree about that. The advertisement may not affect people expenditure, consumers may impulsively afford a product because of their unlimited income or they know consciously what product offers. In spite of that, we do not know for sure the person intention. They may or may not attracted by advertisement.
To sum up, it is not wholly true that advertisement impact consumer's desire despite the slogan and promise had successfully attracted people to buy. Moreover, who knows the inner heart of a person.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Nowadays information is freely available on internet therefore is no longer need for museum To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problem of motorways and what solutions are there?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 55
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- With and increasing population communicating via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...y already had two or five collections. Moreover in another secret of successful trick t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the people') or simply say ''some people''.
Suggestion: some of the people; some people
... the result will be. In another hand, some of people may disagree about that. The advertisem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, may, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10559006211 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88829893635 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2963760295 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5263157895 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160750721177 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048614455723 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300369292089 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899709479599 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247699222765 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.