Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, thanks to worldwide integration, food import has been a convention for the majority of countries. However, while there is a debate about the trend, I believe this is beneficial for the people. This essay will explain the reasons for my statement.
At first glance, it is true that invasion of international products would raise competitiveness in Food and Beverage market for the private sector. However, this adverse effect can actually be controlled by government regulations about tax and other fiscal policies.
On the other hand, to consume outsider food has enormous advantages to residents. Firstly, one nation can avoid or solve unexpected food shortage. Famine usually occurs when consumption exceeds the domestic production. Using an unlimited source of food from other countries, poor people would have a sufficient amount to maintain their lives. Therefore, nations with high population, such as China or the United States, usually import from numerous parts of the world.
Furthermore, selling produces from other regions provides consumers with a wider variety of choice. As many fruits are regional or even endemic to several areas, import for such food may give buyers access to rare production, consequently enrich the experience. For example, the exotic fruits could only be tasted in Southeast Asians countries but at present they are transferred frequently oversea to America and European bloc. Finally, more types of food also benefit users who are following particular dietary regimes such as vegetarianism, since fruit and vegetable range is now larger, making them less repetitive.
In conclusion, although importing food may cause several obstacles, it benefits both the government and the citizens in many areas. Therefore, I believe this is a positive development and authorities should encourage it reasonably.
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. The pollution levels are measured by Sulfur Dioxide and Smoke micrograms per cubic metre.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compariso 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, thanks to worldwide integratio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59010600707 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89793584974 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689045936396 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3676309625 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250766763877 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691282257932 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473365784343 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125555927691 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551674841854 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.