In many societies there is growing emphasis on individualism with people prioritizing their personal goals and desires over collective interest Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

In many societies, there is growing emphasis on individualism, with people prioritizing their personal goals and desires over collective interest. Is this a positive or negative development?

In a myriad of societies many people tend to be individualistic to enrich their dream instead of focusing on the cooperative interest. Personally, I reckon that this perspective leads to a greater unfavourable trend to certain respects which I will elucidate in the forthcoming paragraphs.

On the one side, possibly, in terms of neighbourhood, this ideology might worsen societal connections between people. When a person focuses more on pursuing their personal aims, they are unlikely to pay attention to their community. To exemplify this, people in established regions frequently are egocentric which lack empathy. Furthermore, this principle leads to poor relationships amongst people in their workspace which Affects the ignorance of the team's needs as the utmost aspect to be prioritised. In other words, this character has a tendency to not give a dedication of perspective for their team. As a result, this not only reduces a sense of responsibility in work team society but also affects the bad result from work output and creates a nonconformist perspective.

I appreciate the opposing view stating that egocentric characters which focus on dedication for an individual's ambition tend to carry on their responsibility without any doubt. Nonetheless, psychologically, this behaviour yields self-destruction in the long-term since their surroundings most likely get affected negatively by their self-seeking circumstance.

In summary, from my standpoint in this contemporary era, giving precedence to one's goals in place of focusing community's needs brings more significant harm. Those include that they might feel alienated on a communal scale and poor empathy in person.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-25 Mollymaul 78 view
Essays by user Mollymaul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...n the cooperative interest. Personally, I reckon that this perspective leads to a...
^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ourable trend to certain respects which I will elucidate in the forthcoming parag...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucidate in the forthcoming paragraphs. On the one side, possibly, in terms of n...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...creates a nonconformist perspective. I appreciate the opposing view stating th...
^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...acters which focus on dedication for an individuals ambition tend to carry on their respons...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... contemporary era, giving precedence to ones goals in place of focusing communitys n...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, i reckon, in summary, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63137254902 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37112144889 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639215686275 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8340735957 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221121537793 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764569195691 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042739542421 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123493508222 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373747623873 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.