Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
In this day and age, the question of whether food importation from separate places on the global brings benefits or drawback to the countries’ evolution hitherto has been raising public attention. While many people lament that it is not necessary to import food, I agree with the opposite statement.
We can easily recognize that there are huge benefits of buying international foods. First, we can found a variety of food in many parts of region, which makes countries’ food market become more interesting, appealing to foreign visitors. This will also make a development of the economy by creating more income from tourists, comparing with those nations which depend on interior agricultural, the variety of food sources make importing countries higher advantages of all aspects in economic field. Furthermore, building relationships with the Super-power is one more reasons why many countries prevailing focus on importing external foods. The importation will create a chance to keep in contact with Super-power authorities, which means we have a big advocator for us in the global market and also develop our living standards.
Besides aforementioned advantages, there is one big danger of importing foods. It is conspicuous that depending completely on others’ economic can put our countries in the danger of becoming backyard. A historic example was the American Latin, which became American’s backyard after several times received external budget. Therefore, The government should create a reasonable foreign policy to gain the initiative in developing countries.
In conclusion, importing food can bring us an enormous benefit if we can ultilise it completely
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | RkmsU | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 84
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 56
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In this day and age, the question of whether food importation from separate places o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... We can easily recognize that there are huge benefits of buying international fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55642023346 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03688459102 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618677042802 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5743799446 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256017059635 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890046025692 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643909508041 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147900499671 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777804754282 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.