Today, many people do not know their neighbors.
Why is this?
What can be done about this?
In the current society there is a common issue that people live together in the residential area, but almost of them seem not to realize each other or even lack of sense of community. From my perspective this problem can be derived from distinctive reasons including of subjective and objective factors and this can be palliated by several appropriate methods.
To begin with, people are living in the contemporary era with the advancement and formulation of technological devices which are extremely helpful to the daily life of individuals. However, this is also the factor that leads to the deficiency of connection between each neighbor. With the assistance of the high-tech gadgets, it enables humans to do multiple tasks at home without commuting to workplace, so people have less opportunities to go out and strike up a conversation with each other in their neighborhood. Moreover, people seem to immerse themselves in the virtual world, which prevent them from connecting to their acquaintances and result in the decline of relationships because they almost spend time texting to their friends instead of meeting face to face.
This modern tendency can be countered by more communal activities. In terms of local authority, they should encourage the residents in each residential area to involve in more festivals and musical events, so that everyone is able to communicate to each other and strengthening bond between each neighbor. For instance, the local government organizes the festivals with numerous games that require team-working between each member, so that the connection can be improved noticeably. Turning to individuals, they should engage in more communal activities or create some handmade gift to send it to each neighbor in their living zone, which can contribute to improve the relationship of every member in the neighborhood.
In short, people in the current society have tendency to stay at home and use social media as their recreational activity, which lead to less interaction with other neighbors, so more communal events should be promoted widely.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income that five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment 67
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...munal events should be promoted widely.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3081570997 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99612294083 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555891238671 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4510931069 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.727272727 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0909090909 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209692664285 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886669790643 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637815726141 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13038370675 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417249814129 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.