Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today, the communication ability directly is closed as a result of using mobile phones and computers. I completely agree that the usage of those devices makes the effective interpersonal communication lower in real life.
Most of the people waste too much time on computers and mobile phones, so they have not time to go out with my friends or the families. They seem to forget to strengthen the relationships by meet and talk together. In the space time, they usually keep their eyes glued to screens instead of telling a story or saying a few words with other people. Smart phones become to attract their attention more and more, which causes the downfall of society’s interpersonal communication.
I also believe that using mobile phones and computers increasingly has negative influences on the development of soft skills which play a very important role in the high – quality interaction. An infant may have a language delay if he is always used smart phones to watch cartoon or youtube because his parents have no more time to interact with him. Communication is a major skill which can not be good through writing or reading on internet, while it must be practised with the others everyday. Therefore, the more people use computers and mobiles, the lower the quality of their social relationships will be.
In conclusion, everyone should not use mobile phones and computers, which is one of the reasons for reducing the communication ability face to face.
Comments
Thanks. I hope I will improve
Thanks. I hope I will improve better in the next essay
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...le it must be practised with the others everyday. Therefore, the more people use compute...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04489795918 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9017681206 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620408163265 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0806800198 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.363636364 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292577547735 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107155911338 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988009828928 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191715074454 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749218628376 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.