Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as Sahara or Antarctica. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend for tourists who visit these places?
Travelling has never been as easy as it is nowadays. Individuals can even travel to such remote corners of the world as The South Pole and Sahara that have extreme conditions. While this trend brings about a number of benefits, the negative effects of this should not be overlooked as well.
There are a number of positives for tourists who travel to places with difficult conditions. Firstly, it allows them to explore different types of animals and observe them in their wild habitat. If people go on Safari tours in Africa or helicopter travels over Antarctica, for instance, they have an opportunity to watch animals from elephants and gazelles to polar bears and penguins in their native habitat. Another benefit of paying a visit to these places is the experience of different cultures, usually with primitive lifestyles. Visitors can interact with the locals, taste their food and stay overnight in local tribal villages or other small communities, which would give them unique and memorable experiences.
Choosing Antarctica or Africa as travel destinations can pose some problems for travelers, however. They might face unprecedented dangers in those places. My uncle, for example, has been to an African country as part of his job as a geologist, and stated that Safari tours are especially dangerous as most landscapes are notorious for venomous snakes and mosquitos. Besides dangers, these areas tend to lack basic facilities, ranging from clean, drinking water to poor sanitation. These drawbacks seem to deter tourists from enjoying their travels to the fullest.
Overall, although travelling to destinations with difficult conditions offers the positives in terms of exploring wildlife and culture, detriments of unexpected dangers and lack of basic needs should also be taken into consideration.
- Some people think that success is measured by how much money a person has To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere 78
- Nowadays government creates several laws that badly affect to public Why does government create these rules What should people do for avoiding of this problem 61
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as Sahara or Antarctica What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend for tourists who visit these places 84
- Television dominates the free time of too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36713286713 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81650898659 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5940160535 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176295381507 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580879023498 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676456073655 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880583674009 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378118703925 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.