In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both these

The modern day has witnessed the emergence of financial importance calling for both parents' roles. Spending time working, parents are put under arguments that whether this practice brings about merits of extra prosperity for children, or a shortage of caring as the downside. A overall picture of the two views and a personal perspective promoting endeavors for a balance will be specifically transferred in this essay.

The ball would like to be started rolling with the undeniable claim that offspring are in for better financial offers. With a solid economic background, not only can parents provide children with additional goods, but also deliver favorable timespan for children mental health development, thanks to time saving from overtime working which is hardly achieved when only on member has to cover the income of both. What is more, were it not for a fulfilled financial capacity, there comes possibility that children get upset being compared with others' status. This could lead to children's disillusion of t5heir parents, which should obviously avoided.

However justifiable is the money reason, opposers prompt the indispensable provision of parental guidance, which could be overwhelmed by this practice. By leaving children home alone with freedom, physical and mental training from parental bonding finds it challenging to reach children. Wrong-doing or rational disruption would appear as a thought-provoking result. Furthermore, so heavily-loaded are the household tasks waiting for both parents after working hours that they can drain parents' energy. Consequently, it seems that this exhausting atmosphere gives an counter-development to all members. The money miserably made in this case, is meaningless, as no interest are left to spend time using.

All in all, every coin has its two sides, and so does the issue of either father and mother going out for work. As money is essential to children upbringing, so is mental parental assistance; Therefor, should parents take into account working to ensure financial capacity but also set aside enough caring for offspring in and after work, it is believed that balance will be fostered and outweigh the drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...r a shortage of caring as the downside. A overall picture of the two views and a ...
^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
...m parental bonding finds it challenging to reach children. Wrong-doing or rational disru...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s that this exhausting atmosphere gives an counter-development to all members. The...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, as to, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45588235294 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94201605664 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620588235294 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2639003554 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215579560562 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683598721245 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588088666242 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133491870343 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119334164798 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.