Ecological balance is impossible to achieve when technological progress constantly ruins our environment. Do you agree?
A milestone in the human civilization flows on, the novel era is impended with the exacerbation of technology. Accounting on the profound impact exerted on ecological and environmental aspects, the phenomena aroused a wide concern on the ominous devastation in augmentation. From my perspectives, there is speck of feasibility that not all approaches to this crisis are entirely futile as I will name some of evidence to clarify my point of view as follows.
On the interpretation of the concern, the inevitably impactful relation between the technological progress and the environment is indisputable. As a subsequence of exhausting and overexploitation of natural resources to the relentless innovation and thrive of technology, climate change - a model instance to elaborate the issue may strike out to splash directly into human consciousnesss. Demonstratively, the demand to digital gadgets requires the bleed of fossil materials like iron, bronze from on-the-brink-of-collapse mines, woods from forest, which deteriorates fauna shelters, leading to vast escalating extinction globally. Mirroring the affairs, humankind is urged to take imperative steps to mitigate the current predicament.
Nevertheless, it is impetuous to claim that it has run out of resolutions to restore the inherent balance. namely, green organizations, green finance sustainable development,... are gaining its plausibilty to exceed the approach toward the targeted common benefits. An example may refer to the green finance transition of economy proportion from high-carbon and digital industries to green components. Yet, the taken actions have made the case for the proceeding of imposition and directives to preserve and flinch the uprising consequence. Were there no budget, any ideas can not be paved for operation.
In summary, the brought-about crisis is hard up by our wholesome altoghetherness. it is not provisionary to obscure by the first-glance ineludibility of its but rather to contribute, by large or small, to alloviate the affairs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-23 | minhtrile010@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2014-06-15 | drjowelynt | 63 | view |
- In the future no one buy a printed newspaper or books because they able to read everything that they want online without payment To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh disadvantages 89
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for you 89
- In the future no one buy a printed newspaper or books because they able to read everything that they want online without payment To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both these 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the demand to digital gadgets requires the bleed of fossil materials like iron, bronze f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ps to mitigate the current predicament. Nevertheless, it is impetuous to claim t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Namely
...utions to restore the inherent balance. namely, green organizations, green finance sus...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s, green finance sustainable development,... are gaining its plausibilty to exceed...
^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y ideas can not be paved for operation. In summary, the brought-about crisis is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...rd up by our wholesome altoghetherness. it is not provisionary to obscure by the f...
^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'obscure'?
Suggestion: obscure
...oghetherness. it is not provisionary to obscure by the first-glance ineludibility of it...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73597359736 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.66935444593 2.80592935109 131% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0520736574 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.866666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469066808657 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154519494359 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380199370025 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0254334221749 0.151304729494 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184299983255 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.